SMB Cyber Security Alliance helps Small Businesses address Cyber Security Risks

Posted by William McBorrough, MSIA, CISSP, CISA, CRISC, CEH | Compliance,News,Tools,Users | Sunday 23 January 2011 1:33 pm

Across all industries, small businesses are increasingly facing new threats related to cyber security. Whereas some have taken minimum steps to address these threats but most have not. New security threats and incidents are reported every day in reports and a many remain unreported. This underscores the need for cyber security education of small business owners and managers. These threats have potentially serious consequences and could lead to unrecoverable damage to small businesses.

What are some consequences of the lack of basic cyber security controls?

  • Loss or stolen customer data
  • Loss of intellectual property
  • Decreased productivity
  • Legal liability
  • Regulatory sanctions and fines
  • Computer systems downtime
  • Loss of reputation and customer confidence
  • Loss of revenue
  • Banking

Could this happen to you?

It is very important to understand that neither size nor industry guarantees protection from an attack. The use of computer systems and the Internet makes you vulnerable to attacks and other threats.

A 2010 survey conducted by the Ponemon Institute and Guardian Analytics of over 500 SMBs surfaced these alarming statistics:

  • 55% experienced a fraud attack in the last year
  • 58% of the incidents involved online banking
  • Over 50% experienced multiple incidents
  • 87% failed to fully recover lost funds

You are not a big, well known business. Why would anyone attack you?

While it might be the case that well trained hackers are not very interested in your small company, most online attacks aren’t carried out by expert hackers. Attacks are perpetrated by low-skilled, common criminals with access to pre-packaged hacking tools, thereby casting a wide net in hopes of finding an unprotected computer system or network. These tools are easy to use and readily available on the Internet, often times free of charge. The anonymity of a cyber attack makes it even more attractive to criminals. Many attackers use safe havens in foreign countries which do not have strong cyber crime laws.

Malicious software like viruses, worms, trojan horses, spam, bots are all vectors of cyber attacks that are indiscriminately spreading across the Internet. These attacks don’t only target your small business computer systems but also seek to use your unprotected systems to launch attack on others.

Hasn’t IT guy(s) already dealt with this issue?

Although cyber security includes traditional “IT”related issues, it primarily focuses on protecting your valuable information from all threats including physical attacks, data corruption, equipment failure, social engineering, and bad security choices due to insufficient security awareness education. Effective cyber security management requires specific related to threats, vulnerabilities, and risks affecting computer systems, business operational processes, and most importantly you and your employees. One’s security problems cannot be addressed solely by off the shelf products. Security must be addressed in the boardroom before it is addressed in the computer room.

What are the benefits and cost of cyber security?

Besides avoiding some of the devastating consequences mentioned earlier, good security is simply good business. It does far more than increase customer confidence and protects the integrity of your businesses brand. A secure business increases customer confidence, loyalty and adds to the businesses bottom line.

Responsible businesses understand that management mandates that all threats, including cyber threats, be assessed and managed to protect the business, employees and customers.

The potential cost of inaction far outweighs the cost of action. Analyzing your businesses risks allows you to weigh the costs and benefits and make informed decisions.

Where do you start? Where can you get help?

Although improving your security may seem a daunting task, it doesn’t have to be. Increasing cyber security awareness helps small and medium sized businesses proactively implement simple best practices to protect their businesses. Security should be built into your business processes, information technology (IT), and most importantly your employees and contractors. Each business is unique and faces challenges particular to their operations. There is no magic pill that guarantees 100% security. The SMB Cyber Security Alliance have security experts available to help you understand your unique risks and implement solutions that work your your particular business environment.

Visit us today and sign up for your free membership at http://www.smbcybersecurity.org

The SMB Cyber Security Alliance is volunteer-run organization seeking to increase cyber security awareness in small business communities through education, awareness training, free resources and consultations, and active engagements between small business owners and local security professionals.

Symantec: To Ensure Resiliency Against Critical Infrastructure Cyberattacks

Posted by William McBorrough, MSIA, CISSP, CISA, CRISC, CEH | cyberwar | Monday 11 October 2010 11:50 am

Symantec recommends the following:

  • Develop and enforce IT policies and automate compliance processes. By prioritizing risks and defining policies that span across all locations, organizations can enforce policies through built-in automation and workflow and not only identify threats but remediate incidents as they occur or anticipate them before they happen.
  • Protect information proactively by taking an information-centric approach. Taking a content-aware approach to protecting information is key in knowing who owns the information, where sensitive information resides, who has access, and how to protect it as it is coming in or leaving your organization. Utilize encryption to secure sensitive information and prohibit access by unauthorized individuals.
  • Authenticate identities by leveraging solutions that allow businesses to ensure only authorized personnel have access to systems. Authentication also enables organizations to protect public facing assets by ensuring the true identity of a device, system, or application is authentic. This prevents individuals from accidentally disclosing credentials to an attack site and from attaching unauthorized devices to the infrastructure.
  • Manage systems by implementing secure operating environments, distributing and enforcing patch levels, automating processes to streamline efficiency, and monitoring and reporting on system status.
  • Protect the infrastructure by securing endpoints, messaging and Web environments. In addition, defending critical internal servers and implementing the ability to back up and recover data should be priorities. Organizations also need the visibility and intelligence to respond to threats rapidly.
  • Ensure 24×7 . Organizations should implement testing methods that are non-disruptive and they can reduce complexity by automating failover. Virtual environments should be treated the same as a physical environment, showing the need for organizations to adopt more cross-platform and cross-environment tools, or standardize on fewer platforms.
  • Develop an information management strategy that includes an information retention plan and policies. Organizations need to stop using backup for archiving and legal holds, implement deduplication everywhere to free resources, use a full-featured archive system and deploy data loss prevention technologies.

Source: http://www.symantec.com/content/en/us/about/presskits/Symantec_2010_CIP_Study_Global_Data.pdf

Will your Cloud Provider be around in two years?

Posted by William McBorrough, MSIA, CISSP, CISA, CRISC, CEH | Applications,Network,Systems | Sunday 12 September 2010 11:45 am

I just read that my hosting company, GoDaddy, is on the auction block to be sold to the highest bidder. Naturally, I’m thinking of how this change of ownership could adversely affect the service of my web sites, blogs, and virtual servers.  One never really knows until the new owners take over. Maybe they clean house and things change for the better. Or they may look to cut costs and things could take a downward turn. Migrating to a another service would a pain but I could do it if needed.

This brings to mind the current state of the market. The mad gold rush of cloud services providers continues. Everyone wants a piece of the action.  These companies offer a variety of hosting services for IT infrastructure, platforms and applications.  The lure of moving to the cloud is obvious. Let someone else do it better, cheaper, more reliably and worry about the  details. More organizations are taking advantage. Companies, large and small, are moving their data, applications, and systems to one or more of the legion of providers out there.  This means more dependence on these providers for accessing business critical resources.  Although there are some obvious leaders in the cloud market today ( Google, Amazon, Salesforce), there are also a many smaller boutique providers that compete mostly on price.

In coming years, I expect the market to settle. Some providers will flourish, others will go down in flames or be acquired by one of the larger shops. These changes could have real consequences to customers. What happens if your provider is using proprietary technology and goes out of business?  Migrating to a new provider might be difficult. Doing your due diligence before selecting a provider is very important. Verifying the financial stability of the company and developing a strong service level agreement are key requirements.  Your SLA must address uptime, performance and . The ability to audit your provider is also very important.

Many small businesses would not exist without the cloud. Building, hosting, and managing an IT infrastructure can be cost prohibitive. Choosing the right provider, however, may be the difference between success and failure.

IBM X-Force handicaps future trends in security

Posted by William McBorrough, MSIA, CISSP, CISA, CRISC, CEH | Network,Systems | Sunday 29 August 2010 7:26 pm

Looking ahead, the X-Force Research and Development team has identified some key trends to watch for in the future, including:

Cloud Computing — As an emerging technology, concerns remain a hurdle for organizations looking to adopt cloud computing. As organizations transition to the cloud, IBM recommends that they start by examining the requirements of the workloads they intend to host in the cloud, rather than starting with an examination of different potential service providers. Gaining a good understanding of the needs and requirements first will help organizations take a more strategic approach to adopting cloud services.

– As organizations push workloads into virtual server infrastructures to take advantage of ever increasing CPU performance, questions have been raised about the wisdom of sharing workloads with different security requirements on the same physical hardware. X-Force’s vulnerability data shows that 35 percent of vulnerabilities impacting server class virtualization systems affect the hypervisor, which means that an attacker with control of one virtual system may be able to manipulate other systems on the same machine. This is a significant data point when architecting virtualization projects.

Read more: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ibm-x-force-report-reveals-global-security-threats-have-reached-record-levels-101460029.html

Sweet!! Yourr bootyy look awseome on thiss ivdeo!

Posted by William McBorrough, MSIA, CISSP, CISA, CRISC, CEH | Social Networking | Saturday 14 August 2010 4:10 pm

Gee Thanks! I’ve been working out! …..oh wait a minute! What video??? CLICK!!!!

That was probably the script the culprit had in mind …and who knows how many times it played out.

I received the following message in my inbox earlier from a cousin on .

It was so obviously malicious. Never mind the spelling issues. That is a trick typically used to get by email filters. My first reaction was to log in to Facebook and verify that it was indeed the source. I was reminded of an article I read about a similar fake LinkedIN email attack. In this case, the message was right there with a slight difference. The link now was more obvious.

One of those shortened bit.ly links that could lead you anyway. Without clicking the link, I clicked “reply” asking ” Did you send this?” . I already knew the answer but hey!  I immediately got the following response from one of the sender’s friends.

The plot thickens…

I sent the cousin a message advising a change of Facebook credentials. The message was apparently sent to many other users.  I’ve read and blogged about compromised Facebook account being used to spread and/or lure users to malicious sites but this is my first such experience. I’m not the average Facebook user though, since I only use it to cross-post blog updates.  I didn’t have to time to investigate what’s on the other side of that bit.ly link but just thought I’d share the experience.

Beware fellow Facebook users!

Government Involvement in Cyber war in the last year

Posted by securnetworks | News | Tuesday 10 August 2010 6:07 pm

sophos---report-midyear-2010-wpna.pdf

Security On A Shoestring SMB Budget

Posted by William McBorrough, MSIA, CISSP, CISA, CRISC, CEH | Attacks,Network,Social Networking,Systems | Thursday 8 July 2010 11:03 am

The e-mail appeared to be an invitation from an old, junior high school friend. Yet when the hospital employee clicked on the link, it instead led her to a malicious site that installed a Trojan horse on her computer. In a little over a week, international cybercriminals used that beachhead to steal more than $600,000 from the woman’s employer, according to a terse description of the incident on the Information Systems Association’s Web site.

A number of similar incidents to this one highlight the of online crime facing small and midsize businesses (SMBs), says Stan Stahl, president of Citadel Information Group and president of the Los Angeles chapter of the ISSA.

“Typically, they say, ‘We have firewalls in place and have AV on all the desktops, so I guess we are secure,’” Stahl says. “But today cybercrime is so sophisticated that is not enough anymore.”

Read full article at http://www.darkreading.com/smb-security/security/attacks/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=225702557&cid=RSSfeed

Moving data storage to the cloud? What’s your business continuity plan?

Posted by William McBorrough, MSIA, CISSP, CISA, CRISC, CEH | Network,Systems | Monday 5 July 2010 2:59 pm

Many trumpet increased as a reason to move to the cloud but what happens when your cloud provider is no longer available?

Some companies are faced with this very question this week as storage provider, EMC  announced its plan to shut down its Atmos Online cloud storage service immediately, according to a posting on its website.

EMC launched Atmos Online in May 2009, calling it “Cloud Optimized Storage [with] capabilities that can scale effectively, coupled with and management .”  This placed EMC in direct competition with some of its service provider partners who used EMC’s Atmos technology to provide cloud storage to its customers.

EMC has now  downgraded Atmos Online to a development platform and is offering no guarantee as to the availability of user data moving forward. EMC used its web posting to “strongly encourage [companies to] migrate any critical data or production workloads currently served via Atmos Online to one of our partners offering Atmos based services,”

The provider going out of business is one of the many risks companies have to address when considering moving their critical data into the cloud. In this case, companies now have to spend resources doing the necessary due diligence in selecting an alternative cloud storage provider.

According to Morris Cody, CIO at Washington D.C. based Information Security Services Firm, Secure Intervention, companies moving to the cloud better consider the following:

1) Disaster Recover Plan –  The bottom line is that no cloud provider can guarantee 100% up time all the time. Even a cloud provider as large as Google has experienced an outage in it’s cloud environment.  In that case, a solid disaster recover plan will help mitigate loses from several different perspectives (i.e., monetary, branding, current clients, new clients)

2) BCP – Having a business continuity plan in place that will work in conjunction with you cloud provide capabilities will mitigate the of an outage do to an scheduled / unscheduled event (not necessarily a disaster) in you cloud provider environment.

3) SLA – a strong SLA should be established with your cloud provider that will hold them accountable for losses or damages (define losses and damages) do to changes in their environment that effect your business.  For example, if your cloud provider decides to shutdown the cloud hosting services, then they should be responsible for the cost to migrate your apps/data to the new hosting provider”

What is the values proposition for allowing users access to social networks?

Posted by William McBorrough, MSIA, CISSP, CISA, CRISC, CEH | Social Networking | Monday 21 June 2010 2:36 pm

What is the values proposition for allowing employees access to web 2.0 resources such as social networks?

Every other day, we hear about the risks. Compromised Twitter accounts, via LinkedIN,  malicious apps were only a sample of an every growing landscape. Most enterprises, appreciating the threats these pose to an environment, simply deny access to social networks from company systems and networks.

Even within such organizations, there are user who need to access social networks to perform their job functions. LinkedIN has become a great tool for recruiting prospective new hires. More companies are using Twitter, Facebook, Myspace and others to promote their business an connect with customers.

But outside of that, is there a value in allowing employees, whose job function do not require it, access to social networks on company systems?

I’m prompted to ask this because last week I was at a meeting of the Northern Virginia chapter of the  Information Systems Security Association (ISSA-NOVA) and the speaker was the deputy CISO of the IRS, Devon Bryan. He spoke about how the IRS was dealing with the security challenges posed by Web 2.0, particularly social networking, Their current stance is to block all access except for those employees who job function required it. Most security  professionals would agree this is probably wise. However, he also added that they are looking at technology that would allow users to “view” social networking sites, but not allow them to “update” them. As he explained, or tried to, read vs. write/execute.

As this was an audience full of security professionals, it was quickly pointed out that drive-by downloads only require the user to browse the infected web page or one that is linked to an infected web page. To view is to infect, so to speak. There was then talk of how to mitigate that using virtual machines or proxies.

I have no doubt the technical challenges can be overcome. The hackers who now treat social networks as the new frontier will probably change tact to react as well. Besides wanting to keep employees happy, what’s the policy rationale for allow users to follow their subscribed tweets or friends updates? Never mind, the adverse effect this with have on productivity. Really, why bother?

Pentagon and Congress wants control of your network during cyberattack

Posted by William McBorrough, MSIA, CISSP, CISA, CRISC, CEH | Network,Thoughts | Sunday 6 June 2010 12:25 pm

There has been a lot of chatter in the lately about the possibility of a “widespread coordinated” cyber attack against our critical infrastructure  and our ability to successfully defend against it.  Most of this infrastructure ( eg. utilities, finance, transportation, etc) is owned by private companies. Those currently responsible to protecting these networks will tell you that we are already under attack.  Is there a going on?  Howard Schmidt, the White House’s Cyber Czar says “No”. But let’s not argue semantics. War, skirmish, tomfoolery…call it what you may. Many experts will confess the US is unprepared for a major cyberattack.

What is the government’s role in protecting these private networks? Should it have a role at all? Although some in the private sector are still debating these questions, the government has already moved in action. Last month, the DoD launched its new Cyber Command, headquartered at Ft. Meade, Maryland. Military observers still aren’t quite sure what this supposed to do. The Pentagon’s number two, Deputy Secretary William Lynn, in a gathering of cybersecurity officials and defense contractors,  floated the idea that the “Defense Department might start a protective program for civilian networks”.

According to Lynn, companies may “opt out ” of the program but by doing so would place us all at .  Does that mean, by default, all companies are considered in the program?

The congress also is taking action. A draft bill, co-sponsored by Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), gives the Department of Homeland authority to keep “critical infrastructure” up and running during a “cybersecurity emergency”.

It would be interesting to see the bill’s definition of cybersecurity emergency.   All would agree that coordinated defense is essential. The federal government is probably the only entity able to provide that coordination on a national scale.  Coordination is one thing. Control, however, well that’s another animal.

Next Page »
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes