Symantec warns that port 25 could be the problem. I disagree.

Posted by William McBorrough | Systems | Tuesday 11 May 2010 7:42 pm

I recently overheard a comment by a co-worker ( shoutout Ben A.) that we read and listen to news reports and assumed the report knows what they are  talking about until they turn to a topic we are familiar with in some depth and realize that report spouting off to potentially millions of people don’t have a clue what they are talking about.  How true!

I ran into this article today  titled ” Botnet exploits Linux users’ ignorance“. The writer makes the point that ” a lack of knowledge and awareness about how to use Linux mail servers could be contributing to the disproportionately large number of Linux machines being exploited to send spam”.

I wholeheartedly agree with this. Companies see open source technologies as a means of saving money but do not have staff adequately trained to secure these systems.

The second point I noticed was that the report from Symantec’s Hosted Services referenced in the article pointed out that ” Linux based machines are 5 times more likely to send out spam than Windows based computers”.

The writer quotes a Symantec Analyst as saying:

“…..one reason there is so much spam from Linux could be that many companies that have implemented their own mail servers, and are using open-source software to keep costs down, have not realised that leaving port 25 open to the Internet also leaves them open to abuse.”

That is just misleading. It’s like saying shut down port 80 on your web server to prevent your web site from being defaced or hacked. Port 25 is not the problem, mis-configured web services are the problem.

Is targeted botnets the next wave?

Posted by William McBorrough | Thoughts | Monday 15 March 2010 1:03 pm

Great blog post by RSnake: http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20100314/conversations-with-a-blackhat/

He references his conversation with an actual blackhat. No, not the script-kiddie kind that frequents the forums. I’m referring to the guys who seek no publicity and hire their services out for hefty sums. He blackhat laments the fact that the security practices being put into place a target companies may actually be working. RSnake talks of the potential payday of hackers collaborating with botnet herders for more targeted botnet attacks. My comment on that post is below:

“Interesting post however I don’t see this idea as particularly novel. This is just the natural evolution of the concept of “botnets for rent”. I think the key here is being able to provide the bot herder a list a potential high value targets to go after. This would seem a rather risky proposition for the herder, however, as he would be putting his botnet at greater risk. The secret sauce in a successful botnet is to have it under the radar as long as possible. Bigger risks = bigger rewards, I guess.”-me.

Company develops Virtualized USB key for Online Banking Safety

Posted by William McBorrough | News | Tuesday 23 February 2010 5:55 pm

IronKey has come up with a USB drive that can be used to access accounts virtually without involving the operating system or applications that cause so many of today’s security problems. The drive runs a walled or ‘hardened’ Linux virtual environment inside the PC’s OS. It comes complete with its own browser hardwired to access only a particular bank service, and incorporates RSA Secure ID tokens for authentication.

This allows users  simply plug the drive into any PC, and without the need for any additional drivers or software, after which the host PC was given a precautionary scan for , including specialised banking Trojans such as Zeus. The virtualised environment run from the drive could resist browser based  attacks, session hijacking, and accessed the bank via a hosted service network run either by IronKey or from a dedicated server. This solution is currently mainly targeted for companies that want increased protection in access their accounts but it could very well be the future.

Botnet vs. Botnet

Posted by William McBorrough | News | Wednesday 17 February 2010 12:58 pm

Did you hear the one about the bot that attacked the other bot and killed it? O but not before stealing your online banking credentials, that is.

Security researchers say that the relatively unknown [Spy Eye toolkit] added this functionality just a few days ago in a bid to displace its larger rival, known as Zeus.

The feature, called “Kill Zeus,” apparently removes the Zeus software from the victim’s PC, giving Spy Eye exclusive access to usernames and passwords.

Zeus and Spy Eye are both Trojan-making toolkits, designed to give criminals an easy way to set up their own “botnet” networks of password-stealing programs. These programs emerged as a major problem in 2009, with the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation estimating last October that they have caused $100 million in losses.

Trojans such as Zeus and Spy Eye steal online banking credentials. This information is then used to empty bank accounts by transferring funds to so-called money mules — U.S. residents with bank accounts — who then move the cash out of the country.

Read the full article

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes