Symantec warns that port 25 could be the problem. I disagree.
I recently overheard a comment by a co-worker ( shoutout Ben A.) that we read and listen to news reports and assumed the report knows what they are talking about until they turn to a topic we are familiar with in some depth and realize that report spouting off to potentially millions of people don’t have a clue what they are talking about. How true!
I ran into this article today titled ” Botnet exploits Linux users’ ignorance“. The writer makes the point that ” a lack of knowledge and awareness about how to use Linux mail servers could be contributing to the disproportionately large number of Linux machines being exploited to send spam”.
I wholeheartedly agree with this. Companies see open source technologies as a means of saving money but do not have staff adequately trained to secure these systems.
The second point I noticed was that the report from Symantec’s Hosted Services referenced in the article pointed out that ” Linux based machines are 5 times more likely to send out spam than Windows based computers”.
The writer quotes a Symantec Malware Analyst as saying:
“…..one reason there is so much spam from Linux could be that many companies that have implemented their own mail servers, and are using open-source software to keep costs down, have not realised that leaving port 25 open to the Internet also leaves them open to abuse.”
Great blog post by RSnake:
IronKey
Did you hear the one about the bot that attacked the other bot and killed it? O but not before stealing your online banking credentials, that is.